David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Krzysztof Brzechczyn (ed.)
The book reveals different dimensions of modeling in the historical sciences. Papers collected in the first part (Ontology of the Historical Process) consider different models of historical reality and discuss their status. The second part (Modeling in the Methodology of History) presents various forms of idealization in historiographic research. The papers in the third part (Modeling in the Research Practice) present various models of past reality (e.g. of Poland, Central Europe and the general history of the feudal system) put forward by historians. Other papers consider the status of scientific laws and historical generalizations. The volume will be of interest to those who study analytical philosophy of history, methodology of history and social sciences, social philosophy as well as theory and history of historiography.
|Keywords||Philosophy of History Philosophy of Science Philosophy of Social Science Idealization History|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$37.79 used (67% off) $112.00 direct from Amazon $112.00 new Amazon page|
|Call number||B105.I3.I34 2009|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Krzysztof Brzechczyn (2009). Between Science and Literature: The Debate on the Status of History. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 97 (1):7-30.
Krzysztof Brzechczyn (2009). Methodological Peculiarities of History in Light of Idealizational Theory of Science. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 97 (1):137-157.
Roger Ariew (1986). Descartes as Critic of Galileo's Scientific Methodology. Synthese 67 (1):77 - 90.
John Losee (1987). Philosophy of Science and Historical Enquiry. Oxford University Press.
Ernan McMullin (1985). Galilean Idealization. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 16 (3):247-273.
Andrzej Klawiter (2004). Why Did Husserl Not Become the Galileo of the Science of Consciousness? Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82 (1):253-271.
Francesco Coniglione (2004). Between Abstraction and Idealization: Scientific Practice and Philosophical Awareness. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82 (1):59-110.
Lorenz Krüger, Thomas Sturm, Wolfgang Carl & Lorraine Daston (eds.) (2005). Why Does History Matter to Philosophy and the Sciences? Walter DeGruyter.
Franccsca di Poppa (2001). Rational Reconstructions Revised. Theoria 16 (3):461-480.
Peter Machamer & Franccsca Di Poppa (2001). Rational Reconstructions Revised. Theoria 16 (3):461-480.
Stephen Turner (2008). Mindblind Philosophy of History. Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (2):227-236.
Leonard Mendes Marsak (ed.) (1977). The Nature of Historical Inquiry. R. E. Krieger Publishing Company.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads18 ( #216,624 of 1,934,534 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #145,779 of 1,934,534 )
How can I increase my downloads?