David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 97 (1):137-157 (2009)
The aim of the paper is an extension of the idealizational theory of science in order to explicate intuitions of historians and philosophers of history about unpredictability and contingency of history. The author identifies two types of essential structures: the first kind dominated by the main factor and the second kind which is dominated by a class of secondary factors. In an essential structure dominated by the main factor, the power of influence it exerts is greater than the sum of the power of influence of secondary factors. In an essential structure dominated by secondary factors, their total influence is greater than the influence exerted by the main factor, although the power of the latter influence is greater than the power of influence of each secondary factor taken separately. In the latter kind of essential structure the so-called cascade effect can occur which means that at certain moment the power of influence of secondary factors can be greater than influence of main factor. In the further part of this paper, the author examines consequences of cascade effect for construction of scientific theory and historical narrative.
|Keywords||Philosophy of History Methodology of history Ontology of history Contingency in history idealization|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Krzysztof Lastowski (1994). The Idealizational Status of the Contemporary Theory of Evolution. Theoria 9 (1):29-51.
Joachim Schummer (1997). Towards a Philosophy of Chemistry. A Short Extract of This Paper Was First Read at the 10th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Florence, August 19–25, 1995. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science 28 (2):307-336.
Andrzej Kupracz (1994). An Outline of the Idealizational Theory of Science: Four Basic Models. Theoria 9 (1):7-18.
Peter P. Kirschenmann (1985). Neopositivism, Marxism, and Idealization: Some Comments on Professor Nowak's Paper. Studies in East European Thought 30 (3):219-235.
Cassandra Pinnick & George Gale (2000). Philosophy of Science and History of Science: A Troubling Interaction. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science 31 (1):109-125.
Joseph Margolis (1990). The Methodological and Metaphysical Peculiarities of the Human Sciences. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 15 (1):167-182.
Jerzy Topolski (2011). Idealizational Procedures in History. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 97 (1):87-108.
Francesco Fagiani (1983). Natural Law and History in Locke's Theory of Distributive Justice. Topoi 2 (2):163-185.
Joachim Schummer (1997). Towards a Philosophy of Chemistry. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28 (2):307 - 336.
Added to index2010-08-16
Total downloads6 ( #237,968 of 1,692,211 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #184,284 of 1,692,211 )
How can I increase my downloads?