Popper on definitions
Journal for General Philosophy of Science 36 (1):15 - 28 (2005)
| Abstract | In the present paper I shall first summarize Popper's criticism of the traditional method of definition, and then go on to comment critically on his own views on the form and function of so-called nominalist definitions | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Kristina Meshelski (2011). Two Kinds of Definition in Spinoza's Ethics. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (2):201-218.
Nicholas Maxwell (2005). Popper, Kuhn, Lakatos and Aim-Oriented Empiricism. Philosophia 32 (1-4):181-239.
Maurilio Lovatti (1996). Neopositivists' Crusade Against Karl Popper. Per la Filosofia (36):99-109.
Boudewijn de Bruin (2006). Popper's Conception of the Rationality Principle in the Social Sciences. In Ian Jarvie, David Miller & Karl Milford (eds.), Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment: Selected Papers from Karl Popper 2002: Volume III: Science. Ashgate.
Newton C. A. Costdaa & Jean-Yves Béziau (1998). Définition, Théorie Des Objets Et Paraconsistance (Definition, Objects' Theory and Paraconsistance). Theoria 13 (2):367-379.
Rod O'Donnell (1992). Keynes's Weight of Argument and Popper's Paradox of Ideal Evidence. Philosophy of Science 59 (1):44-52.
Bruce Caldwell (2005). Recovering Popper: For the Left? Critical Review 17 (1-2):49-68.
Nicholas Maxwell (1972). A Critique of Popper's Views on Scientific Method. Philosophy of Science 39 (2):131-152.
Pavel Tichy (1974). On Popper's Definitions of Verisimilitude. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (2).
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads16 ( #75,663 of 556,788 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,788 )How can I increase my downloads? |

