Graduate studies at Western
International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (5):691-723 (2012)
|Abstract||Abstract The present paper suggests to consider Kierkegaard?s use of Abraham?s story in Fear and Trembling in regulative terms, that is, to consider it as a model ? not for our moral behaviour but rather for our religious behaviour. To do so, I first rely on recent literature to argue that Kierkegaard should be regarded as a distinctively post-Kantian philosopher: namely, a philosopher who goes beyond Kant in a way that is nevertheless true to the spirit of Kant?s original critical philosophy. Then, I present a post-Kantian reading of Fear and Trembling, focusing on the problematic implications that result from comparing this text with Hegel?s theory of recognition. Finally, I submit that sacrifice in Fear and Trembling is a regulative notion in a Kantian sense. This interpretation addresses some of the most problematic aspects of the text. I conclude that the regulativity of sacrifice may be regarded as an important and perhaps an essential component of Kierkegaard?s overall philosophical strategy|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Lippitt (2003). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kierkegaard and Fear and Trembling. Routledge.
Jerome I. Gellmann (2001). Fear and Trembling: Kierkegaard's Christian Work. Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):61-74.
Jerome I. Gellmann (2001). Fear and Trembling. Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):61-74.
Amy Laura Hall (2000). Self-Deception, Confusion, and Salvation in "Fear and Trembling" with "Works of Love". Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (1):37 - 61.
Daniel Watts (2011). Dilemmatic Deliberations In Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling. Faith and Philosophy 28 (2):174-189.
Michelle Kosch (2006). Kierkegaard's Ethicist: Fichte's Role in Kierkegaard's Construction of the Ethical Standpoint. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88 (3):261-295.
Ronald M. Green (1993). Enough is Enough! "Fear and Trembling" is Not About Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 21 (2):191 - 209.
William Bristow (2012). Thinking Outside the Circle: The Place of Kierkegaard in Stern'sUnderstanding Moral Obligation. Inquiry 55 (6):606-621.
Paul Dietrichson (1969). Ii. Introduction to a Reappraisal of Fear and Trembling. Inquiry 12 (1-4):236 – 245.
John Lippitt (2008). What Neither Abraham nor Johannes de Silentio Could Say. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 82 (1):79-99.
Søren Kierkegaard (2006). Fear and Trembling. Cambridge University Press.
Bruce Russell (1975). What is the Ethical in Fear and Trembling? Inquiry 18 (3):337 – 343.
Paolo Diego Bubbio (2013). Kant's Sacrificial Turns. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (2):97-115.
Andrew Cross (2003). Faith and the Suspension of the Ethical in Fear and Trembling. Inquiry 46 (1):3 – 28.
Added to index2012-11-30
Total downloads4 ( #189,291 of 739,474 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,287 of 739,474 )
How can I increase my downloads?