Philosophy 77 (4):565-595 (2002)
|Abstract||Modern virtue ethics is commonly presented as an alternative to Kantian and utilitarian views—to ethics focused on action and obligations—and it invokes Aristotle as a predecessor. This paper argues that the Nichomachean Ethics does not represent virtue ethics thus conceived, because the discussion of the virtues of character there serves a quasi-Platonic psychology: it is an account of how to tame the unruly (non-rational) elements of the human soul so that they can be ruled by reason and the laws it imposes. This is explicitly stated in Book X, where it is also affirmed that the question of which laws reason should impose is addressed in The Politics. The Ethics and Politics can therefore be seen as a unity—as Aristotle's version of Plato's Republic—and it is the failure to recognize this that explains Aristotle's misappropriation by the modern virtue ethicists.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jonathan J. Sanford (unknown). Aristotle's Divided Mind: Some Thoughts on Intellectual Virtue and Aristotle's Occasional Dualism. :77-90.
Aristotle (2006/1998). Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford University Press, USA.
May Sim (2011). Rethinking Virtue Ethics and Social Justice with Aristotle and Confucius. Asian Philosophy 20 (2):195-213.
Xianzhong Huang (2007). Justice as a Virtue: An Analysis of Aristotle's Virtue of Justice. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (2):265-279.
Jiyuan Yu (1998). Virtue: Confucius and Aristotle. Philosophy East and West 48 (2):323-347.
Aristotle (2004). The Nicomachean Ethics. Penguin Books.
Mary Ella Savarino (1993). Toward an Ontology of Virtue Ethics. Journal of Philosophical Research 18:243-259.
Peter Hadreas (2002). Aristotle on the Vices and Virtue of Wealth. Journal of Business Ethics 39 (4):361 - 376.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads60 ( #16,008 of 549,724 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,807 of 549,724 )
How can I increase my downloads?