Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):515-515 (1998)
|Abstract||MacNeilage's target article develops a theory for the evolution of human speech articulation along the lines of “slot- filler” structure. His content/frame schema commits him to the tenets of embodiment, muscle sense, and a memory for speech. My commentary ties these aspects together in their historical and current perspective.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert W. Schrauf (2002). Bilingual Inner Speech as the Medium of Cross-Modular Retrieval in Autobiographical Memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):698-699.
Rae Langton & Jennifer Hornsby (1998). Free Spech and Illocution. Legal Theory 4:21-37.
Caroline West (2003). The Free Speech Argument Against Pornography. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33 (3):391 - 422.
David Braddon-Mitchell & Caroline West (2004). What is Free Speech? Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (4):437-460.
Glenn Carruthers (2008). Types of Body Representation and the Sense of Embodiment. Consciousness and Cognition 17 (1302):1316.
Manuel de Vega (1997). Embodiment in Language-Based Memory: Some Qualifications. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):22-23.
Irene M. Pepperberg (1998). Out of the Mouths of Babes . . . And Beaks of Birds? A Broader Interpretation of the Frame/Content Theory for the Evolution of Speech Production. [REVIEW] Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):526-527.
Glenn Carruthers (2009). Is the Body Schema Sufficient for the Sense of Embodiment? An Alternative to de Vignmont's Model. Philosophical Psychology 22 (2):123-142.
Douglas N. Husak (1985). What is so Special About [Free] Speech? Law and Philosophy 4 (1):1 - 15.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #160,171 of 548,976 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?