Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):140-141 (2009)
|Abstract||Carruthers argues that an integrated faculty of metarepresentation evolved for mindreading and was later exapted for metacognition. A more consistent application of his approach would regard metarepresentation in mindreading with the same skeptical rigor, concluding that the “faculty” may have been entirely exapted. Given this result, the usefulness of Carruthers’ line-drawing exercise is called into question|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Lydia L. Moland (2003). Inheriting, Earning, and Owning. The Owl of Minerva 34 (2):139-170.
David Pereplyotchik (2009). Global Broadcasting and Self-Interpretation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):156-157.
Adam Shriver & Colin Allen (2005). Consciousness Might Matter Very Much. Philosophical Psychology 18 (1):113-22.
Peter Carruthers (2009). Banishing" I" and" We" From Accounts of Metacognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):148.
Peter Carruthers (2009). Mindreading Underlies Metacognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):164-182.
Joëlle Proust (2007). Metacognition and Metarepresentation: Is a Self-Directed Theory of Mind a Precondition for Metacognition? [REVIEW] Synthese 159 (2):271 - 295.
James R. Roney & Dario Maestripieri (2002). The Importance of Comparative and Phylogenetic Analyses in the Study of Adaptation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):525-525.
Stephen Biggs (2007). The Phenomenal Mindreader: A Case for Phenomenal Simulation. Philosophical Psychology 20 (1):29-42.
Added to index2009-04-24
Total downloads37 ( #37,027 of 739,392 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,392 )
How can I increase my downloads?