David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 4 (3):27-48 (2001)
Liberal political thought is underwritten by an enduring fear of civil and state violence. It is assumed within liberal thought that self?interest characterises relations between individuals in civil society, resulting in violence. In absolutist doctrines, such as Hobbes?, the pacification of private persons depended on the Sovereign's command of a monopoly of violence. Liberals, by contrast, sought to claim that the state itself must be pacified, its capacity for cruelty (e.g., torture) removed, its capacity for violence (e.g., war) reduced and controlled. A core tension within liberal thought thus arises between containing civil violence by empowering the state and containing state violence by constraining the state. One result of this tension is the highly selective conception of ?pacification? within liberalism, which, historically, has accommodated indifference to endemic violence, both within civil society, and beyond civil society ? as in (past) arguments licensing imperialism and in (present) arguments for disciplining ?rogue? states
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David Hume (1739/2000). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford University Press.
Judith Shklar (1989). The Liberalism of Fear. In Nancy L. Rosenblum (ed.), Liberalism and the Moral Life.
Carl Schmitt & Tracy B. Strong (2006). Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. University of Chicago Press.
Carl Schmitt (1996). The Concept of the Political. University of Chicago Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Stathis N. Kalyvas (2004). The Paradox of Terrorism in Civil War. Journal of Ethics 8 (1):97-138.
Johanna Oksala (2012). Foucault, Politics, and Violence. Northwestern University Press.
Burkhard Liebsch (2013). What Does (Not) Count as Violence: On the State of Recent Debates About the Inner Connection Between Language and Violence. [REVIEW] Human Studies 36 (1):7-24.
Kai Nielsen (1981). On Justifying Violence. Inquiry 24 (1):21 – 57.
E. Frazer & K. Hutchings (2011). Avowing Violence: Foucault and Derrida on Politics, Discourse and Meaning. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (1):3-23.
Virginia Held (1997). The Media and Political Violence. Journal of Ethics 1 (2):187-202.
Robert L. Holmes (2001). A Western Perspective on the Problem of Violence. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:193-205.
Verena Erlenbusch (2011). Notes on Violence: Walter Benjamin's Relevance for the Study of Terrorism. Journal of Global Ethics 6 (2):167-178.
Jeffrey R. Baker, Enjoining Coercion: Squaring Civil Protection Orders with the Reality of Domestic Abuse.
Marilea Bramer (2011). Domestic Violence as a Violation of Autonomy and Agency. Social Philosophy Today 27:97-110.
David C. Durst (2001). The Limits of Toleration in John Locke's Liberal Thought. Res Publica 7 (1):39-55.
Added to index2011-10-19
Total downloads5 ( #359,244 of 1,725,161 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,161 of 1,725,161 )
How can I increase my downloads?