Peter Singer's argument for utilitarianism
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (3):175-194 (2005)
| Abstract | The paper begins by situating Singer within the British meta-ethical tradition. It sets out the main steps in his argument for utilitarianism as the ‘default setting’ of ethical thought. It argues that Singer’s argument depends on a hierarchy of reasons, such that the ethical viewpoint is understood to be an adaptation – an extension – of a fundamental self-interest. It concludes that the argument fails because it is impossible to get from this starting-point in self-interest to his conception of the ethical point of view. The fundamental problem is its mixing the immiscible: the Humean subordination of reason to interest with the Kantian conception of reason as universal and authoritative. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJoakim Sandberg & Niklas Juth (2011). Ethics and Intuitions: A Reply to Singer. Journal of Ethics 15 (3):209-226.
Shia Moser (1963). A Comment on Mill's Argument for Utilitarianism. Inquiry 6 (1-4):308-318.
Christopher Goodmacher (2007). Partiality and World Poverty. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (2):74-85.
Christopher Goodmacher (2007). Partiality and World Poverty. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (2):74-85.
Richard Hanley (2004). A Modest Proposal. Public Affairs Quarterly 18.
Yew-Kwang Ng & Peter Singer (1983). Ng and Singer on Utilitarianism: A Reply. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13 (2):241 - 242.
Roger Fjellstrom (2002). Equality Does Not Entail Equality Across Species. Environmental Ethics 24 (4):339-352.
Yew-Kwang Ng & Peter Singer (1990). An Argument for Utilitarianism: A Defence. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68 (4):448 – 454.
Yew-Kwang Ng & Peter Singer (1981). An Argument for Utilitarianism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):229 - 239.
Stephen Buckle (2011). Assessing Peter Singer's Argument for Utilitarianism: Drawing a Lesson From Rousseau and Kant. Journal of Value Inquiry 45 (2):215-227.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads48 ( #22,894 of 556,888 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,888 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
