Reply to Fenton, Fleck, Powers and Voigt

Jurisprudence 6 (1):151-155 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Arras and Fenton reply.John Arras & Elizabeth Fenton - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (3):5-6.
Fleck and the social constitution of scientific objectivity.Melinda B. Fagan - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40 (4):272-285.
The turn for ultimate harm: a reply to Fenton.Ingmar Persson & Julian Savulescu - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (7):441-444.
Voigt kinematics and electrodynamic consequences.Albert G. Gluckman - 1976 - Foundations of Physics 6 (3):305-316.
Qu'est-ce que la logique?Voigt Voigt - 1893 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 36:445.
Can Rationing Be Fair?L. Fleck - 2002 - Hastings Center Report 32 (5):4.
Leonard M. Fleck replies.Leonard M. Fleck - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (3):7-8.
World 5 and medical knowledge.Kazem Sadegh-Zadeh - 1981 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (3):263-270.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-10

Downloads
5 (#1,432,111)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Allen Buchanan
University of Arizona

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references