Social moral epistemology

Social Philosophy and Policy 19 (2):126-152 (2002)
The distinctive aim of applied ethics is to provide guidance as to how we ought to act, as individuals and as shapers of social policies. In this essay, I argue that applied ethics as currently practiced is inadequate and ought to be transformed to incorporate what I shall call social moral epistemology. This is a branch of social epistemology, the study of the social practices and institutions that promote the formation, preservation, and transmission of true beliefs. For example, social epistemologists critically evaluate the comparative advantages of adversarial versus inquisitorial criminal proceedings as mechanisms for the discovery of truth.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0265052502192065
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,904
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Richard E. Ashcroft (2004). Bioethics and Conflicts of Interest. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 35 (1):155-165.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

97 ( #26,987 of 1,725,444 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #268,753 of 1,725,444 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.