David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (3):189-212 (2000)
: Two basic criticisms of managed care are that it erodes patient trust in physicians and subjects physicians to incentives and pressures that compromise the physician's fiduciary obligation to the patient. In this article, I first distinguish between status trust and merit trust, and then argue (1) that the value of status trust in physicians is probably over-rated and certainly underdocumented; (2) that erosion of status trust may not be detrimental if accompanied by an increase in well-founded merit trust; and (3) that under conditions of managed care the physician's commitment to traditional medical ethics cannot serve as an adequate basis for merit trust. Next, drawing on an analogy between managed care organizations and polities, I argue that (4) the most appropriate basis for merit trust in managed care is a conception of organizational legitimacy that includes procedural justice, empowerment of constructive criticism within the organization, and organizational accommodation of the noninstrumental commitment to patient well-being that is distinctive of medical professionalism. I then explore the conditions necessary for robust competition for merit trust among managed care organizations and indicate the kinds of public policies needed to facilitate such competition. Finally, I show how the account of organization-based merit trust can accommodate the special fiduciary obligation of medical professionals, without indulging in the delusion that it is the physician's fiduciary obligation always to provide all care that is expected to be of any net benefit to the patient.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Ana Smith Iltis (2005). Values Based Decision Making: Organizational Mission and Integrity. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 17 (1):6-17.
Sarah Wall (2007). Organizational Ethics, Change, and Stakeholder Involvement: A Survey of Physicians. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 19 (3):227-243.
Avery Kolers (2005). Justice and the Politics of Deference. Journal of Political Philosophy 13 (2):153–173.
Similar books and articles
Wayne Vaught (2003). Trust, Covert Surveillance and Fiduciary Obligations. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (1):87-92.
George W. Rimler & Richard D. Morrison (1993). The Ethical Impacts of Managed Care. Journal of Business Ethics 12 (6):493 - 501.
George Khushf (1999). The Case for Managed Care: Reappraising Medical and Socio-Political Ideals. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (5):415 – 433.
Allen E. Buchanan (1987). The Profit Motive in Medicine. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 12 (1):1-35.
Chalmers C. Clark (2002). Trust in Medicine. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (1):11 – 29.
George G. J. Agich (1999). The Importance of Management for Understanding Managed Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (5):518 – 534.
Marc A. Rodwin (2010). The Metamorphosis of Managed Care: Implications for Health Reform Internationally. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 38 (2):352-364.
Patricia Illingworth (2002). Trust: The Scarcest of Medical Resources. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (1):31 – 46.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #85,375 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #183,615 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?