Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (1):31–61 (1997)
|Abstract||All theories of the right to secede either understand the right as a remedial right only or also recognize a primary right to secede. By a right in this context is meant a general, not a special, right (one generated through promising, contract, or some special relationship). Remedial Right Only Theories assert that a group has a general right to secede if and only if it has suffered certain injustices, for which secession is the appropriate remedy of last resort.1 Different Remedial Right Only Theories identify different injustices as warranting the remedy of secession.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Similar books and articles
Gideon Engler (2002). Einstein and the Most Beautiful Theories in Physics. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (1):27 – 37.
Allen Buchanan (1991). Toward a Theory of Secession. Ethics 101 (2):322-342.
Allen Buchanan, Secession. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Nicolaus Tideman (2004). Secession as a Human Right. Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (1):9-19.
Bruno Coppieters & Richard Sakwa (eds.) (2003). Contextualizing Secession: Normative Studies in Comparative Perspective. OUP Oxford.
Matthew J. Webb (2006). Is There a Liberal Right to Secede From a Liberal State? TRAMES 10 (4):371-386.
David Copp (1998). International Law and Morality in the Theory of Secession. Journal of Ethics 2 (3):219-245.
Matthew J. Webb (forthcoming). Kashmir's Right to Secede: A Critical Examination of Contemporary Theories of Secession. Routledge.
Josep Costa (2003). On Theories of Secession: Minorities, Majorities and the Multinational State. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (2):63-90.
Michel Seymour (2007). Secession as a Remedial Right. Inquiry 50 (4):395 – 423.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads256 ( #935 of 752,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,997 of 752,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?