Graduate studies at Western
Analysis 35 (January):111-112 (1975)
|Abstract||Alvin plantinga and michael slote, Following ayer, Have attempted to formulate the argument from analogy for the existence of other minds as an enumerative induction. Their way of avoiding the 'generalizing from a single case' objection is shown to be fallacious|
|Keywords||Analogy Induction Metaphysics Minds|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter Ray (1976). An Inductive Argument for Other Minds. Philosophical Studies 29 (February):129-139.
Alvin Plantinga (1968). Induction and Other Minds II. Review of Metaphysics 12 (March):524-33.
Jane Heal (2000). Other Minds, Rationality and Analogy. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplement 74 (74):1-19.
J. W. Meiland (1966). Analogy, Verification, and Other Minds. Mind 75 (October):564-568.
George N. Schlesinger (1974). Induction and Other Minds. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 52 (May):3-21.
T. Parent (2013). Note on Induction. Think 12 (33):37-39.
Michael A. Slote (1966). Induction and Other Minds. Review of Metaphysics 20 (December):341-60.
Alvin Plantinga (1966). Induction and Other Minds. Review of Metaphysics 19 (March):441-61.
Erik Gotlind (1954). Mr Hampshire on the Analogy of Feeling. Mind 63 (October):519-524.
Don Locke (1973). Just What is Wrong with the Argument From Analogy? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51 (August):153-56.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads60 ( #19,310 of 739,463 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,337 of 739,463 )
How can I increase my downloads?