Philosophia Mathematica 13 (3):297-307 (2005)
|Abstract||Current versions of nominalism in the philosophy of mathematics have the benefit of avoiding commitment to the existence of mathematical objects. But this comes with the cost of not taking mathematical theories literally. Jody Azzouni's Deflating Existential Consequence has recently challenged this conclusion by formulating a nominalist view that lacks this cost. In this paper, we argue that, as it stands, Azzouni's proposal does not yet succeed. It faces a dilemma to the effect that either the view is not nominalist or it fails to take mathematics literally. After presenting the dilemma, we suggest a possible solution for the nominalist.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Howard Peacock (2009). What's Wrong with Ostrich Nominalism? Philosophical Papers 38 (2):183-217.
Dale Dorsey (2011). The Hedonist's Dilemma. Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (2):173-196.
J. Melia (2000). Weaseling Away the Indispensability Argument. Mind 109 (435):455-480.
Torsten Wilholt (2006). Think About the Consequences! Nominalism and the Argument From the Philosophy of Logic. Dialectica 60 (2):115–133.
Rafal Urbaniak (2010). Neologicist Nominalism. Studia Logica 96 (2):149-173.
Otavio Bueno (2010). Logicism Revisited. Principia 5 (1-2):99-124.
Yvonne Raley (2009). Deflating Existence Away? A Critique of Azzouni's Nominalism. Philosophia Mathematica 17 (1):73-83.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #58,686 of 549,007 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,007 )
How can I increase my downloads?