British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (1):85-113 (2012)
|Abstract||Batterman () raises a number of concerns for the inferential conception of the applicability of mathematics advocated by Bueno and Colyvan (). Here, we distinguish the various concerns, and indicate how they can be assuaged by paying attention to the nature of the mappings involved and emphasizing the significance of interpretation in this context. We also indicate how this conception can accommodate the examples that Batterman draws upon in his critique. Our conclusion is that ‘asymptotic reasoning’ can be straightforwardly accommodated within the inferential conception|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Otávio Bueno (2011). An Inferential Conception of the Application of Mathematics. Noûs 45 (2):345-374.
Gordon Belot (2005). Whose Devil? Which Details? Philosophy of Science 72 (1):128-153.
Feng Ye (2010). The Applicability of Mathematics as a Scientific and a Logical Problem. Philosophia Mathematica 18 (2):144-165.
Mark Colyvan (2001). The Miracle of Applied Mathematics. Synthese 127 (3):265 - 277.
Robert Batterman (2010). On the Explanatory Role of Mathematics in Empirical Science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (1):1-25.
Francis Bailly (2010). Mathematics and the Natural Sciences: The Physical Singularity of Life. Imperial College Press.
Chris Daly & Simon Langford (2009). Mathematical Explanation and Indispensability Arguments. Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237):641-658.
O. Bueno (2012). An Easy Road to Nominalism. Mind 121 (484):967-982.
Alan Baker & Mark Colyvan (2011). Indexing and Mathematical Explanation. Philosophia Mathematica 19 (3):323-334.
Christopher Pincock (2011). On Batterman's 'On the Explanatory Role of Mathematics in Empirical Science'. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (1):211-217.
Mark Colyvan, Indispensability Arguments in the Philosophy of Mathematics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Lawrence Sklar (1998). The Language of Nature is Mathematics—but Which Mathematics? And What Nature? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (3):241–261.
Penelope Maddy (1990). Realism in Mathematics. Oxford University Prress.
Otávio Bueno & Øystein Linnebo (eds.) (2009). New Waves in Philosophy of Mathematics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Chris Pincock (2007). A Role for Mathematics in the Physical Sciences. Noûs 41 (2):253 - 275.
Added to index2011-08-06
Total downloads90 ( #7,748 of 549,090 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,152 of 549,090 )
How can I increase my downloads?