Philosophy of Science 66 (3):485 (1999)
|Abstract||A first step is taken towards articulating a constructive empiricist philosophy of mathematics, thus extending van Fraassen's account to this domain. In order to do so, I adapt Field's nominalization program, making it compatible with an empiricist stance. Two changes are introduced: (a) Instead of taking conservativeness as the norm of mathematics, the empiricist countenances the weaker notion of quasi-truth (as formulated by da Costa and French), from which the formal properties of conservativeness are derived; (b) Instead of quantifying over spacetime regions, the empiricist only admits quantification over occupied regions, since this is enough for his or her needs|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
P. Dicken (2006). Can the Constructive Empiricist Be a Nominalist? Quasi-Truth, Commitment and Consistency. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37 (2):191-209.
Marc Alspector-Kelly (2006). Constructive Empiricism and Epistemic Modesty: Response to Van Fraassen and Monton. Erkenntnis 64 (3):371 - 379.
Matthias Steup (2011). Empiricism, Metaphysics, and Voluntarism. Synthese 178 (1):19-26.
Jeffrey Ketland (1999). Deflationism and Tarski's Paradise. Mind 108 (429):69-94.
Jamin Asay (2009). Constructive Empiricism and Deflationary Truth. Philosophy of Science 76 (4):423-443.
Cezary Cieśliński (2007). Deflationism, Conservativeness and Maximality. Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (6):695 - 705.
Marc Alspector-Kelly (2001). Should the Empiricist Be a Constructive Empiricist? Philosophy of Science 68 (4):413-431.
Cezary Cieśliński (2010). Truth, Conservativeness, and Provability. Mind 119 (474):409-422.
Otávio Bueno (2000). Quasi-Truth in Quasi-Set Theory. Synthese 125 (1-2):33-53.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #124,537 of 556,803 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,803 )
How can I increase my downloads?