David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sophia 48 (1):15 - 34 (2009)
A number of recent discussions of atheism allude to cosmological arguments in support of theism. The five ways of Aquinas are classic instances, offered as rational justification for theistic belief. However, the five ways receive short shrift. They are curtly dismissed as vacuous, arbitrary, and even insulting to reason. I contend that the atheistic critique of the Thomistic five ways, and similarly formulated cosmological arguments, argues at cross purposes because it misrepresents them. I first lay out the context, intent and structure of Aquinas’ arguments, then show in what way recent discussions misrepresent them, and finally conclude with a comment on metaphysical orientation, which I take to be central, not only to a proper understanding of the Thomistic five ways but generally to the debate between atheism and theism on the existence of God.
|Keywords||Aquinas Cosmological arguments Existence of God Atheism Dawkins|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Richard M. Gale (2007). The Failure of Classical Theistic Arguments. In Michael Martin (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 86--101.
John Hick (1973). Philosophy of Religion. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall.
Anthony Kenny (1980). The Five Ways: St. Thomas Aquinas' Proofs of God's Existence. University of Notre Dame Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mikael Stenmark (1998). The End of the Theism–Atheism Debate? A Response to Vincent Brümmer. Religious Studies 34 (3):261-280.
Lara Denis (2003). Kant's Criticism of Atheism. Kant-Studien 94 (2):198-219.
Jason T. Eberl (2010). Varieties of Dualism. International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (1):39-56.
J. William Forgie (1995). The Cosmological and Ontological Arguments: How Saint Thomas Solved the Kantian Problem. Religious Studies 31 (1):89 - 100.
Charles A. Hart (1952). Participation and the Thomistic Five Ways. New Scholasticism 26 (3):267-282.
W. Norris Clarke (2007). The Philosophical Approach to God: A New Thomistic Perspective. Fordham University Press.
Benjamin Cordry (2011). A More Dangerous Enemy? Philo's “Confession” and Hume's Soft Atheism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (1):61-83.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads45 ( #37,910 of 1,102,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #46,918 of 1,102,935 )
How can I increase my downloads?