Graduate studies at Western
H. M. Buiting, A. van Der Heide, B. D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, M. L. Rurup, J. A. C. Rietjens, G. Borsboom, P. J. van Der Maas & J. J. M. van Delden
Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (1):24-29 (2009)
|Abstract||Objectives: To investigate why physicians label end-of-life acts as either ‘euthanasia/ending of life’ or ‘alleviation of symptoms/palliative or terminal sedation’, and to study the association of such labelling with intended reporting of these acts. Methods: Questionnaires were sent to a random, stratified sample of 2100 Dutch physicians (response: 55%). They were asked to label six hypothetical end-of-life cases: three ‘standard’ cases and three cases randomly selected (out of 47), that varied according to (1) type of medication, (2) physician’s intention, (3) type of patient request, (4) patient’s life expectancy and (5) time until death. We identified the extent to which characteristics of cases are associated with physician’s labelling, with multilevel multivariable logistic regression. Results: The characteristics that contributed most to labelling cases as ‘euthanasia/ending of life’ were the administration of muscle relaxants (99% of these cases were labelled as ‘euthanasia/ending of life’) or disproportional morphine (63% of these cases were labelled accordingly). Other important factors were an intention to hasten death (54%) and a life expectancy of several months (46%). Physicians were much more willing to report cases labelled as ‘euthanasia’ (87%) or ‘ending of life’ (56%) than other cases. Conclusions: Similar cases are not uniformly labelled. However, a physicians’ label is strongly associated with their willingness to report their acts. Differences in how physicians label similar acts impede complete societal control. Further education and debate could enhance the level of agreement about what is physician-assisted dying, and thus should be reported, and what not|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Hilde Buiting, Johannes van Delden, Bregje Onwuteaka-Philpsen, Judith Rietjens, Mette Rurup, Donald van Tol, Joseph Gevers, Paul van Der Maas & Agnes van Der Heide (2009). Reporting of Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide in the Netherlands: Descriptive Study. BMC Medical Ethics 10 (1):18-.
H. M. Buiting, J. K. M. Gevers, J. A. C. Rietjens, B. D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, P. J. van Der Maas, A. van Der Heide & J. J. M. van Delden (2008). Dutch Criteria of Due Care for Physician-Assisted Dying in Medical Practice: A Physician Perspective. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):e12-e12.
J. Cohen, J. van Delden, F. Mortier, R. Lofmark, M. Norup, C. Cartwright, K. Faisst, C. Canova, B. Onwuteaka-Philipsen & J. Bilsen (2008). Influence of Physicians' Life Stances on Attitudes to End-of-Life Decisions and Actual End-of-Life Decision-Making in Six Countries. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (4):247-253.
H. M. Buiting, M. A. C. Karelse, H. A. A. Brouwers, B. D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, A. van Der Heide & J. J. M. van Delden (2010). Dutch Experience of Monitoring Active Ending of Life for Newborns. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (4):234-237.
Georg Bosshard, , Tore Nilstun, , Johan Bilsen, , Michael Norup, , Guido Miccinesi, , Johannes J. M. van Delden, Karin Faisst, , Agnes van der Heide & for the European End-of-Life, Forgoing Treatment at the End of Life in 6 European Countries.
A. C. Rietjens Judith, J. Der Maas Pauvanl, D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen Bregje, J. M. Delden Johannevans & Agnes van der Heide (2009). Two Decades of Research on Euthanasia From the Netherlands. What Have We Learnt and What Questions Remain? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3).
Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Gerrit van Der Wal & Lode Wigersma (2000). Consultation and Discussion with Other Physicians in Cases of Requests for Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide Refused by Family Physicians. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (03):381-390.
J. A. Rietjens, J. R. Voorhees, A. van der Heide & M. A. Drickamer (forthcoming). Approaches to Suffering at the End of Life: The Use of Sedation in the USA and Netherlands. Journal of Medical Ethics:2012-100561.
William Wong, Arnold R. Eiser, Robert G. Mrtek & Paul S. Heckerling (2004). By-Person Factor Analysis in Clinical Ethical Decision Making: Q Methodology in End-of-Life Care Decisions. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):W8-W22.
K. Raus, L. Anquinet, J. Rietjens, L. Deliens, F. Mortier & S. Sterckx (forthcoming). Factors That Facilitate or Constrain the Use of Continuous Sedation at the End of Life by Physicians and Nurses in Belgium: Results From a Focus Group Study. Journal of Medical Ethics:2012-100571.
J. A. C. Rietjens, D. G. van Tol, M. Schermer & A. van Der Heide (2009). Judgement of Suffering in the Case of a Euthanasia Request in The Netherlands. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (8):502-507.
Lindsay Cole, Jennifer Kesselheim & Aaron Kesselheim (2012). Ethical Issues in New Drug Prescribing. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (1):77-83.
M. P. Battin, A. van Der Heide, L. Ganzini, G. van Der Wal & B. D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen (2007). Legal Physician-Assisted Dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: Evidence Concerning the Impact on Patients in "Vulnerable" Groups. Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (10):591-597.
William M. O'Fallon, Richard I. Walker & H. Robert Van Der Vaart (1971). The Study of Granulocyte Kinetics by Mathematical Analysis of DNA Labelling. Acta Biotheoretica 20 (3-4).
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads4 ( #189,291 of 739,354 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?