Can feminism politicize hermeneutics and reconstruct deconstruction?
Social Epistemology 5 (4):361 – 369 (1991)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRoy Martinez (ed.) (1997). The Very Idea of Radical Hermeneutics. Humanities Press.
Eftichis Pirovolakis (2010). Reading Derrida and Ricoeur: Improbable Encounters Between Deconstruction and Hermeneutics. State University of New York Press.
Veronica Vasterling (2003). Postmodern Hermeneutics? Towards a Critical Hermeneutics. In Lorraine Code (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Pennsylvania State University Press.
R. Sundara Rajan (1991). Studies in Phenomenology, Hermeneutics, and Deconstruction. Distributed by Allied Publishers.
Hugh J. Silverman & Don Ihde (eds.) (1985). Hermeneutics & Deconstruction. State University of New York Press.
Stephen M. Feldman (2000). Made for Each Other: The Interdependence of Deconstruction and Philosophical Hermeneutics. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (1):51-70.
Rodolphe Gasché (2000). Specters of Nietzsche. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:183-193.
Donatella Di Cesare (2004). Stars and Constellations: The Difference Between Gadamer and Derrida. Research in Phenomenology 34 (1):73-102.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-02-01Total downloads2 ( #232,575 of 549,124 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
