Graduate studies at Western
Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (2):218-232 (2012)
|Abstract||In Turkey, as in many other countries, infertility is generally regarded as a negative phenomenon in a woman’s life and is associated with a lot of stigma by society. In other words, female infertility and having a baby using Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) have to be taken into consideration with respect to gender, motherhood, social factors, religion and law. Yet if a woman chooses to use ART she has to deal with the consequences of her decision, such as being ostracized by society. Other types of procedures in this area, such as sperm and ova donation or surrogate motherhood, are not permitted in law. However, both before and after the development of this techonology, society has been finding its own solutions which are rarely questioned and are still performed. This article will discuss what these practices are and try to reach some pragmatic conclusions concerning female infertility, the concept of motherhood and some traditional practices in Turkey|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michele Goodwin, Assisted Reproductive Technology & the Double-Bind: The Illusory Choice of Motherhood.
Susan L. Crockin (2010). Legal Conceptions: The Evolving Law and Policy of Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Véronique Fournier, Denis Berthiau, Julie D.’Haussy & Philippe Bataille (2013). Access to Assisted Reproductive Technologies in France: The Emergence of the Patients' Voice. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (1):55-68.
Enrico Maestri (2011). Fabbriche Della Vita. La Critica Ecofemminista Alle Tecniche Riproduttive Artificiali. Ragion Pratica 37 (2):417-442.
Jennifer Parks (2009). Rethinking Radical Politics in the Context of Assisted Reproductive Technology. Bioethics 23 (1):20-27.
Drew Carter, Amber M. Watt, Annette Braunack-Mayer, Adam G. Elshaug, John R. Moss & Janet E. Hiller (2013). Should There Be a Female Age Limit on Public Funding for Assisted Reproductive Technology? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (1):79-91.
Maren Klawiter (1990). Using Arendt and Heidegger to Consider Feminist Thinking on Women and Reproductive / Infertility Technologies. Hypatia 5 (3):65 - 89.
Sonia Bychkov Green, Interstate Intercourse: How Modern Assisted Reproductive Technologies Challenge the Traditional Realm of Conflicts of Law.
Anne Donchin (1989). Review: The Growing Feminist Debate Over the New Reproductive Technologies. [REVIEW] Hypatia 4 (3):136 - 149.
Drew Carter & Annette Braunack-Mayer (2011). The Appeal to Nature Implicit in Certain Restrictions on Public Funding for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Bioethics 25 (8):463-471.
Ruby Catsanos, Wendy Rogers & Mianna Lotz (2013). The Ethics of Uterus Transplantation. Bioethics 27 (2):65-73.
Reyes Lázaro (1986). Feminism and Motherhood: O'Brien Vs Beauvoir. Hypatia 1 (2):87 - 102.
Mairi Levitt (2004). Assisted Reproduction: Managing an Unruly Technology. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 12 (1):41-49.
Bridget J. Crawford & Lolita Buckner Inniss, Multiple Anxieties: Breaching Race, Class and Gender Norms with Assisted Reproduction.
Lori B. Andrews (1989). Control and Compensation: Laws Governing Extracorporeal Generative Materials. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (5):541-560.
Added to index2012-02-20
Total downloads20 ( #68,271 of 739,304 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,029 of 739,304 )
How can I increase my downloads?