Balancing Procreative Autonomy and Parental Responsibility

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (2):268-276 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Rationality and the Genetic Challenge: Making People Better? Matti Häyry provides a clear and informed discussion and analysis of a number of competing answers to the above questions. Häyry describes three main perspectives on the morality of prenatal genetic diagnosis , the “restrictive,” “moderate,” and “permissive” views, and his analysis illuminates that these views can be distinguished in terms of their different “rationalities”—their respective understanding of what counts as a reasonable choice for parents to make in light of PGD

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Qué hijos tener. Libertad procreativa, autonomía parental y principio del daño.Blanca Rodríguez López - 2011 - Telos: Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios Utilitaristas 18 (1):127-151.
Procreative beneficence – cui Bono?Jakob Elster - 2009 - Bioethics 25 (9):482-488.
Autonomy Gone Mad.Alfred I. Tauber - 2003 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (1):75-80.
Parental consent and the use of dead children's bodies.T. M. Wilkinson - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (4):337-358.
Schoeman’s Alternative to the Liberal View of the Family.Richard O’Neil - 1987 - Philosophy Research Archives 13:217-224.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
55 (#283,585)

6 months
10 (#257,583)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Tom Buller
Illinois State University
Stephanie Bauer
University of Alaska, Anchorage