¿Qué es un individuo concreto?
Theoria 1 (1):121-128 (1985)
| Abstract | The paper investigates the problems whether a concrete individual can be defined as a set or be characterized by an abstract theory. In particular, Jesês Mosterín’s objection to a theory of things proposed by the present author is discussed. Also, the view of scientific theories held by Sneed, and adopted by Mosterln, is analyzed. It is concluded that any adequate description of a concrete individual calls for more than a mathematical formalism | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPaul Strauss (1991). Arithmetical Set Theory. Studia Logica 50 (2):343 - 350.
Walter Brüning (1956). Indivíduo E Pessoa Na Concepção Actual Do Homem. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 12 (2):138 - 150.
Jean-pierre Marquis (1997). Abstract Mathematical Tools and Machines for Mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica 5 (3):250-272.
Barbara L. Horan (1986). Sociobiology and the Semantic View of Theories. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:322 - 330.
Ernest W. Adams (1993). Classical Physical Abstraction. Erkenntnis 38 (2):145 - 167.
Carlo Cellucci (2007). Romanticism in Mathematics. Newsletter of the HPM Group 64 (March):17-19.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads2 ( #232,684 of 549,683 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,683 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
