David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Moral Education 7 (1):3-8 (1977)
Abstract Lawrence Kohlberg thinks that Utilitarianism and Rawls? theory of justice are formal elaborations of different stages in the psychological development of moral reasoning. He also thinks that there are psychological reasons to favour the stage of reasoning of which he thinks Rawls? theory is an elaboration, and he believes that these reasons are isomorphic with philosophical criteria of adequacy that are normally used in evaluating moral theories. I argue that if he is right, then Rawls? own arguments for the philosophical superiority of his principles of justice over Utilitarianism must be wrong. But, I argue if they are, then, by the claim of isomorphism, it must follow that Kohlberg's own arguments are wrong. I then take a closer look at the alleged isomorphism and attempt to show that Kohlberg has confused ethics with meta?ethics in the development of his views
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John A. Codd (1977). Some Conceptual Problems in the Cognitive‐Developmental Approach to Morality. Journal of Moral Education 6 (3):147-157.
Don Locke (1980). The Illusion of Stage Six. Journal of Moral Education 9 (2):103-109.
Elizabeth A. Morelli (1978). The Sixth Stage of Moral Development. Journal of Moral Education 7 (2):97-108.
Helen Weinreich (1975). Kohlberg and Piaget: Aspects of Their Relationship in the Field of Moral Development. Journal of Moral Education 4 (3):201-213.
Paul Formosa (2011). Discipline and Autonomy: The Kantian Link Between Education and Morality. In Klas Roth & Chris Surprenant (eds.), Kant and Education: Interpretations and Commentary. Routledge
Hye-Jeong Baek (2002). A Comparative Study of Moral Development of Korean and British Children. Journal of Moral Education 31 (4):373-391.
Frederick Doepke (1990). The Endorsements of Interpretation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (3):277-294.
Iordanis Kavathatzopoulos (1991). Kohlberg and Piaget: Differences and Similarities. Journal of Moral Education 20 (1):47-54.
Lawrence Kohlberg (1974). Education, Moral Development and Faith1. Journal of Moral Education 4 (1):5-16.
Djilali Bouhmama (1984). Assessment of Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development in Two Cultures. Journal of Moral Education 13 (2):124-132.
Clark Power (1988). The Just Community Approach to Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 17 (3):195-208.
Larry May (1985). The Moral Adequacy of Kohlberg's Moral Development Theory. In Carol Gibb Harding (ed.), Moral Dilemmas and Ethical Reasoning. Transaction Publishers
Richard Peters (1978). The Place of Kohlberg's Theory in Moral Education∗. Journal of Moral Education 7 (3):147-157.
Lawrence J. Walker & Thomas J. Moran (1991). Moral Reasoning in a Communist Chinese Society. Journal of Moral Education 20 (2):139-155.
Dorota Czyżowska & Adam Niemczyński (1996). Universality of Socio‐Moral Development: A Cross‐Sectional Study in Poland. Journal of Moral Education 25 (4):441-453.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads17 ( #224,658 of 1,911,814 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #82,235 of 1,911,814 )
How can I increase my downloads?