Review of John P. Burgess and Gideon Rosen: A Subject with No Object: Strategies for Nominalistic Interpretation of Mathematics [Book Review]

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):161-167 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/49.1.161

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A Subject with No Object: Strategies for Nominalistic Interpretation of Mathematics.John P. Burgess & Gideon Rosen - 2001 - Studia Logica 67 (1):146-149.
A Subject with No Object: Strategies for Nominalistic Interpretation of Mathematics.John Burgess & Gideon Rosen - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 50 (198):124-126.
A subject with no object: strategies for nominalistic interpretation of mathematics.John P. Burgess & Gideon Rosen - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Gideon A. Rosen.
A Subject with No Object: Strategies for Nominalistic Interpretation of Mathematics.Thomas Hofweber - 2001 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):723-727.
A Subject with No Object. Strategies for Nominalistic Interpretations of Mathematics.John P. Burgess & Gideon Rosen - 1999 - Noûs 33 (3):505-516.
Book Review: John P. Burgess and Gideon Rose. A Subject with No Object: Strategies for Nominalistic Interpretation of Mathematics. [REVIEW]Stewart Shapiro - 1998 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 39 (4):600-612.
Review of J. P. Burgess and G. Rosen, A Subject with No Object: Strategies for Nominalistic Interpretation of Mathematics.Bob Hale - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):161-167.
Review of J. P. Burgess and G. A. Rosen, A Subject With No Object. Strategies for Nominalistic Interpretation of Mathematics. [REVIEW]Michael D. Resnik - 1999 - Noûs 33 (3):505–516.
The Burgess-Rosen critique of nominalistic reconstructions.Charles Chihara - 2007 - Philosophia Mathematica 15 (1):54--78.
BURGESS, JP and ROSEN, G.-A Subject with No Object.M. Detlefsen - 2000 - Philosophical Books 41 (3):153-162.
Mathematics and Metalogic.Daniel Bonevac - 1984 - The Monist 67 (1):56-71.
That obscure object of psychoanalysis.Dany Nobus - 2013 - Continental Philosophy Review 46 (2):163-187.
Nominalism, Trivialism, Logicism.Agustín Rayo - 2015 - Philosophia Mathematica 23 (1):nku013.
Imputational Interpretation and Evolution of the Self.Susrut Ray - 2005 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (1):63-69.
Knowledge by Acquaintance Reconsidered.Augustin Riska - 1980 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 11 (1):129-140.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
8 (#1,243,760)

6 months
2 (#1,136,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Indexing and Mathematical Explanation.Alan Baker & Mark Colyvan - 2011 - Philosophia Mathematica 19 (3):323-334.
Mathematics and bleak house.John P. Burgess - 2004 - Philosophia Mathematica 12 (1):18-36.
Epistemological objections to platonism.David Liggins - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (1):67-77.
Is Cantor's continuum problem inherently vague?Kai Hauser - 2002 - Philosophia Mathematica 10 (3):257-285.
Labyrinth of Continua.Patrick Reeder - 2018 - Philosophia Mathematica 26 (1):1-39.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references