Coinciding objects: Reply to Lowe and Denkel
Analysis 57 (1):11–18 (1997)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesE. J. Lowe (2005). How Are Ordinary Objects Possible? The Monist 88 (4):510-533.
L. A. Paul (2006). Coincidence as Overlap. Noûs 40 (4):623–659.
P. T. Geach (1982). Reply to Lowe's Reply. Analysis 42 (1):32 -.
Cody Gilmore (2007). Time Travel, Coinciding Objects, and Persistence. In Dean Zimmerman (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, vol. 3.
Cody Gilmore (2010). Coinciding Objects and Duration Properties: Reply to Eagle. In Dean Zimmerman (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, vol. 5. Oxford University Press.
Arda Denkel (1996). Object and Property. Cambridge University Press.
E. J. Lowe (1995). Coinciding Objects: In Defence of the 'Standard Account'. Analysis 55 (3):171 - 178.
Eric T. Olson (2003). Lowe's Defence of Constitutionalism. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):92–95.
Alan Sidelle (1991). Formed Matter Without Objects: A Reply to Denkel. Dialogue 30 (1-2):163-.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads44 ( #25,377 of 549,196 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,196 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
