The Dilemma of Case Studies Resolved: The Virtues of Using Case Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science

Perspectives on Science 9 (4):383-404 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophers of science turned to historical case studies in part in response to Thomas Kuhn's insistence that such studies can transform the philosophy of science. In this issue Joseph Pitt argues that the power of case studies to instruct us about scientific methodology and epistemology depends on prior philosophical commitments, without which case studies are not philosophically useful. Here I reply to Pitt, demonstrating that case studies, properly deployed, illustrate styles of scientific work and modes of argumentation that are not well handled by currently standard philosophical analyses. I illustrate these claims with exemplary findings from case studies dealing with exploratory experimentation and with interdisciplinary cooperation across sciences to yield multiple independent means of access to theoretical entities. The latter cases provide examples of ways that scientists support claims about theoretical entities that are not available in work performed within a single discipline. They also illustrate means of correcting systematic biases that stem from the commitments of each discipline taken separately. These findings illustrate the transformative power of case study methods, allow us to escape from the horns of Pitt's "dilemma of case studies," and vindicate some of the post-Kuhn uses to which case studies have been put.

Similar books and articles

Perverse engineering.Chris Haufe - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (4):437-446.
Some methodological issues in experimental economics.Deborah Mayo - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (5):633-645.
The discovery of argon: A case for learning from data?Aris Spanos - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (3):359-380.
Human Posture: The Nature of Inquiry.John A. Schumacher - 1989 - State University of New York Press.
Is frequentist testing vulnerable to the base-rate fallacy?Aris Spanos - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (4):565-583.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
568 (#28,192)

6 months
81 (#47,336)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Identifying logical evidence.Ben Martin - 2020 - Synthese 198 (10):9069-9095.
More Thoughts on HPS: Another 20 Years Later.Jutta Schickore - 2011 - Perspectives on Science 19 (4):453-481.
Individual differences, uniqueness, and individuality in behavioural ecology.Rose Trappes - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 96 (C):18-26.

View all 38 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach.Peter Urbach & Colin Howson - 1993 - Chicago: Open Court. Edited by Peter Urbach.

View all 27 references / Add more references