David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 2 (1):39 – 55 (2008)
This paper1 uses concepts of anxiety and Foucauldian governmentality to investigate the ways that the discourses supporting the ban on performance-enhancing drugs in sport have been manipulated and broadened to treat this issue as a public policy and health issue rather than an example of rule violation in sport. Some effects of this expansion include the broadening of drug testing to include testing for recreational drugs, the intrusion of both central governments and scientific experts into the issue and the curtailment of civil liberties for athletes. A further effect has been the perpetration of injustices against athletes under the guise of such injustices being necessary to maintain the integrity of sport
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
C. Colwell (1994). The Retreat of the Subject in the Late Foucault. Philosophy Today 38 (1):56-69.
Geoff Danaher (2000). Understanding Foucault. Sage Publications.
Mitchell Dean (2002). Powers of Life and Death Beyond Governmentality. Journal for Cultural Research 6 (1-2):119-138.
A. W. McHoul (1993/1998). A Foucault Primer: Discourse, Power, and the Subject. University of Otago Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Andy Miah (2012). Genetic Technologies and Sport: The New Ethical Issue. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 28 (1):32-52.
Thomas Biebricher (2008). Genealogy and Governmentality. Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (3):363-396.
Richard Mullen, Lew Hardy & Andrew Tattersall (2005). The Effects of Anxiety on Motor Performance: A Test of the Conscious Processing Hypothesis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 27 (2):212-225.
Catriona Macleod & Kevin Durrheim (2002). Foucauldian Feminism: The Implications of Governmentality. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 32 (1):41–60.
Gordon Hull (2008). One View of the Dungeon: Torture and the Ticking Time Bomb Between Governmentality and Sovereignty. International Studies in Philosophy 40 (2):11-31.
Michael W. Austin (2009). Magnanimity, Athletic Excellence, and Performance-Enhancing Drugs. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):46-53.
Derek Kerr (1999). Beheading the King and Enthroning the Market: A Critique of Foucauldian Governmentality. Science and Society 63 (2):173 - 202.
Mark Nesti (2011). Phenomenology and Sports Psychology: Back To The Things Themselves! Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 5 (3):285 - 296.
Roy Goddard (2010). Critiquing the Educational Present: The (Limited) Usefulness to Educational Research of the Foucauldian Approach to Governmentality. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (3):345-360.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #263,482 of 1,696,514 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #343,026 of 1,696,514 )
How can I increase my downloads?