Evidence: Supreme Court of Georgia Denies Law Firm Access to Hospital Records
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (3):314-315 (2000)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesTheodore W. Ruger (2004). The United State Supreme Court and Health Law: The Year in Review: The Supreme Court Federalizes Managed Care Liability. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (3):528-531.
Eugenia L. Siegler & Andrew B. Cohen (2011). Conflicts Over Control and Use of Medical Records at the New York Hospital Before the Standardization Movement. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):640-648.
Kristin Lefebvre (2007). An Ethical Evaluation of the Supreme Court Decision Regarding ERISA Interpretation. Journal of Philosophical Research 32:327-334.
Gabriel Uzquiano (2004). The Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Justices: A Metaphysical Puzzle. Noûs 38 (1):135–153.
James D. Sellmann (2006). On the Origin of Shang and Zhou Law. Asian Philosophy 16 (1):49 – 64.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-08-31Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
