Hintikka et Sandu versus Frege in re Arbitrary Functions
Philosophia Mathematica 1 (1):50-65 (1993)
| Abstract | Hintikka and Sandu have recently claimed that Frege's notion of function was substantially narrower than that prevailing in real analysis today. In the present note, their textual evidence for this claim is examined in the light of relevant historical and biographical background and judged insufficient. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSøren Overgaard (2008). How to Analyze Immediate Experience:. Hintikka, Husserl, and the Idea of Phenomenology. Metaphilosophy 39 (3):282–304.
Gabriel Sandu (1994). Uses and Misuses of Frege's Ideas. The Monist 77 (3):278-293.
Dagfinn Føllesdal (1994). Comments on Quine, Prawitz, Hintikka and Sandu, and Smith. Synthese 98 (1):175 - 186.
Jaakko Hintikka & Gabriel Sandu (1994). What is a Quantifier? Synthese 98 (1):113 - 129.
Anders Engstrøm (2001). Hintikka and Sandu on Metaphor. Philosophia 28 (1-4):391-410.
L. Haaparanta & J. Hintikka (eds.) (1986). Frege Synthesized. D. Reidel Publishing Co..
Gabriel Sandu (2001). Signalling in Languages with Imperfect Information. Synthese 127 (1-2):21 - 34.
Richard Heck & Jason Stanley (1993). Reply to Hintikka and Sandu: Frege and Second-Order Logic. Journal of Philosophy 90 (8):416 - 424.
Jaakko Hintikka & Gabriel Sandu (1992). The Skeleton in Frege's Cupboard: The Standard Versus Nonstandard Distinction. Journal of Philosophy 89 (6):290-315.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads15 ( #78,761 of 549,671 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,671 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
