How the choice of experimental organism matters: Biological practices and discipline boundaries
Synthese 92 (1):151-166 (1992)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJacques Demongeot (2009). Biological Boundaries and Biological Age. Acta Biotheoretica 57 (4).
Manfred D. Laubichler & Gunter P. Wagner (2000). Organism and Character Decomposition: Steps Towards an Integrative Theory of Biology. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):300.
Arthur B. Markman (2001). Choice Output and Choice Processing: An Analogy to Similarity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):423-424.
Robert Arp (2007). Evolution and Two Popular Proposals for the Definition of Function. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 38 (1):19 - 30.
Marshall Abrams (2009). Fitness “Kinematics”: Biological Function, Altruism, and Organism–Environment Development. Biology and Philosophy 24 (4):487-504.
Sabina Leonelli & Rachel Ankeny (2011). What’s so Special About Model Organisms? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42 (2):313-323.
Jack A. Wilson (2000). Ontological Butchery: Organism Concepts and Biological Generalizations. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):311.
Richard M. Burian (1993). How the Choice of Experimental Organism Matters: Epistemological Reflections on an Aspect of Biological Practice. Journal of the History of Biology 26 (2):351 - 367.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads5 ( #160,518 of 549,699 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,699 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
