Lex genetica: The law and ethics of programming biological code [Book Review]

Ethics and Information Technology 4 (2):109-121 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent advances in genetic engineering nowallow the design of programmable biologicalartifacts. Such programming may include usageconstraints that will alter the balance ofownership and control for biotechnologyproducts. Similar changes have been analyzedin the context of digital content managementsystems, and while this previous work is usefulin analyzing issues related to biologicalprogramming, the latter technology presents new conceptual problems that require morecomprehensive evaluation of the interplaybetween law and technologically embeddedvalues. In particular, the ability to embedcontractual terms in technological artifactsnow requires a re-examination of disclosure andconsent in transactions involving such artifacts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
27 (#557,528)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

CQ Sources/Bibliography.Bette Anton - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (4):348-350.
CQ Sources/Bibliography.Bette Anton - 2008 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (2).
CQ Sources/Bibliography.Bette Anton - 2008 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (4):465-467.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The privatization of information policy.Niva Elkin-Koren - 2000 - Ethics and Information Technology 2 (4):201-209.

Add more references