David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (2):140-153 (2010)
The argument from potential has been hard to assess because the versions presented by friends and those presented by enemies have born very little resemblance to each other. I here try to improve this situation by attempting to bring both versions into enforced contact. To this end, I sketch a more detailed analysis of the modern concept of potential than any hitherto attempted. As one would expect, arguments from potential couched in terms of that notion are evident non-starters. I then ask how the modern notion of potential needs to be supplemented in order to produce a more convincing argument. I then enquire whether the supplementations utilised in the most distinguished recent presentations of the argument have anything better than an ad hoc role to play in contemporary metaphysics. I conclude that the rehabilitation of the argument is unlikely; in any event, the onus of proof seems to be on the friend of that argument to show that it is uncontrived. Finally, I argue that the (modern) notion of potential has an important role to play in any plausible account of foetal value
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Gerald Lang (2012). Is There Potential in Potentiality? Philosophical Papers 41 (1):129-147.
Marco Stier & Bettina Schoene-Seifert (2013). The Argument From Potentiality in the Embryo Protection Debate: Finally “Depotentialized”? American Journal of Bioethics 13 (1):19-27.
Dr Marco Stier (2013). Tetraploide Komplementierung von iPS-Zellen: Implikationen für das Potenzialitätsargument. [REVIEW] Ethik in der Medizin:1-14.
Similar books and articles
Nicholas H. Steneck (2006). Fostering Integrity in Research: Definitions, Current Knowledge, and Future Directions. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):53-74.
Amy Mullin (2011). Children and the Argument From 'Marginal' Cases. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (3):291-305.
Lucy Carter (2007). A Case for a Duty to Feed the Hungry: GM Plants and the Third World. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1):69-82.
Joseph Packer (2011). Better Never to Have Been?: The Unseen Implications. [REVIEW] Philosophia 39 (2):225-235.
Giangiacomo Gerla (2007). Multivalued Logic to Transform Potential Into Actual Objects. Studia Logica 86 (1):69 - 87.
S. McLean (2002). Interests in Abortion: A New Perspective on Foetal Potential and the Abortion Debate: T Martin. Avebury, 2000, Pound40.00, Pp 113. ISBN 0-7546-1146-. [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (2):132-a-132.
Frederick M. Kronz (1992). Carnap and Achinstein on Evidence. Philosophical Studies 67 (2):151 - 167.
A. Giubilini (2012). Abortion and the Argument From Potential: What We Owe to the Ones Who Might Exist. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):49-59.
Gary Atkinson (2006). Potential Being and the Source of Cosmic Order. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (3):345-369.
Added to index2010-02-21
Total downloads35 ( #48,585 of 1,099,049 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #58,176 of 1,099,049 )
How can I increase my downloads?