Putting structuralism in its place
Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||One textbook may introduce the real numbers in Cantor’s way, and another in Dedekind’s, and the mathematical community as a whole will be completely indifferent to the choice between the two. This sort of phenomenon was famously called to the attention of philosophers by Paul Benacerraf. It will be argued that structuralism in philosophy of mathematics is a mistake, a generalization of Benacerraf’s observation in the wrong direction, resulting from philosophers’ preoccupation with ontology.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Simon Friederich (2010). Structuralism and Meta-Mathematics. Erkenntnis 73 (1):67 - 81.
Geoffrey Hellman (2001). Three Varieties of Mathematical Structuralism. Philosophia Mathematica 9 (2):184-211.
Audrey Yap (2009). Logical Structuralism and Benacerraf's Problem. Synthese 171 (1):157 - 173.
Christopher Menzel (1990). Structuralism and Conceptual Change in Mathematics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:397 - 401.
John Forge (2002). Reflections on Structuralism and Scientific Explanation. Synthese 130 (1):109 - 121.
Julian C. Cole (2010). Mathematical Structuralism Today. Philosophy Compass 5 (8):689-699.
Added to index2009-04-12
Total downloads64 ( #17,545 of 755,029 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #12,418 of 755,029 )
How can I increase my downloads?