Nursing Philosophy 11 (1):25-41 (2010)
|Abstract||Throughout their history, symbolic interactionism and critical perspective have been viewed as divergent theoretical perspectives with different philosophical underpinnings. A review of their historical and philosophical origins reveals both points of divergence and areas of convergence. Their underlying philosophies of science and views of human freedom are different as is their level of focus with symbolic interactionism having a micro perspective and critical perspective using a macro perspective. This micro/macro difference is reflected in the divergence of their major concepts, goals and basic tenets. While their underlying philosophies are different, however, they are not necessarily contradictory and areas of convergence may include the concepts of reference groups and looking glass self within symbolic interactionism and ideological hegemony within critical perspective. By using a pragmatic approach and combining symbolic interactionism and critical perspectives, both micro and macro levels come into focus and strategies for change across individual and societal levels can be developed and applied. Application of both symbolic interactionism and critical perspective to nursing research and scholarship offers exciting new opportunities for theory development and research methodologies. In nursing education, these two perspectives can give students added insight into patients' and families' problems at the micro level while, at the same time, giving them a lens to see and tools to apply to problems at the macro level in health care. In nursing practice, a combined symbolic interactionism/critical perspective approach assists nurses to give high-quality care at the individual level while also working at the macro level to address the manufacturers of illness. New research questions emerge from this combination of perspectives with new possibilities for theory development, a transformation in nursing education, and the potential for new practice strategies that can address individual client and larger system problems through empowerment of clients and nurses.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Reiner Keller (2011). The Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse (SKAD). Human Studies 34 (1):43-65.
Edward W. Averill & Bernard Keating (1981). Does Interactionism Violate a Law of Classical Physics? Mind 90 (January):102-7.
George Francis Cronk (1973). Symbolic Interactionism. Social Theory and Practice 2 (3):313-333.
Marcelo Sabatés (2001). Micro-Level Indeterminism and Macro-Level Determinism. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:11-18.
Mary K. McCurry, Susan M. Hunter Revell & Sr Callista Roy (2010). Knowledge for the Good of the Individual and Society: Linking Philosophy, Disciplinary Goals, Theory, and Practice. Nursing Philosophy 11 (1):42-52.
Jeffery A. Thompson & David W. Hart (2006). Psychological Contracts: A Nano-Level Perspective on Social Contract Theory. Journal of Business Ethics 68 (3):229 - 241.
Kristine Bærøe (2008). Priority Setting in Health Care: On the Relation Between Reasonable Choices on the Micro-Level and the Macro-Level. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (2):87-102.
Stuart Nairn (2009). Social Structure and Nursing Research. Nursing Philosophy 10 (3):191-202.
Craig J. Calhoun (ed.) (2007). Contemporary Sociological Theory. Blackwell Pub..
Joseph Margolis (1966). Objectivism and Interactionism. Philosophy of Science 33 (June):118-123.
Added to index2009-12-25
Total downloads31 ( #39,336 of 549,084 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,084 )
How can I increase my downloads?