The moral floor: A philosophical examination of the connection between ethics and business [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 91 (1):145 - 154 (2010)
|Abstract||This paper examines the philosophical basis for the argument that there is a connection between ethical behavior and profitability. Both sides of this argument – that good ethics is good business and that bad ethics is bad business – are explored. The possibility of a moral floor above which ethical behavior is not rewarded is considered, and an economic experiment testing such a proposition is discussed. Johnson & Johnson suffers a potentially devastating blow when some cyanide-laced Tylenol capsules cause several deaths. Johnson & Johnson voluntarily pulls Tylenol off the shelf, to universal acclaim. When Tylenol is returned to the marketplace, its share of the over-the-counter painkiller market becomes greater than it was before the tragedy. Arthur Andersen, the venerable accounting firm, is caught in the web surrounding the downfall of Enron, Inc. As Enron’s various sins are discovered, it is found that Arthur Andersen auditors had signed off on flawed audits and had shredded documents to cover themselves. Andersen is prosecuted for, and convicted of, obstructing justice (although the conviction is later overturned). Today the firm barely exists and has no resemblance to the Big Five accounting giant of 1999. These stories seem to indicate that ethical (or unethical) behavior leads to positive (or negative) financial results. But the philosophical arguments underpinning such statements are seldom subjected to proper analysis. They are perhaps wishful thinking, or perhaps based on examples such as the above without considering other examples that may reinforce a contrary position. This paper will explore the philosophical arguments and empirical evidence regarding these statements and state some research questions for exploration in this area. In particular we will propose the possibility that a moral floor exists above which firms that engage in ethical activities will not reap rewards, but below which firms that engage in unethical activities will be punished by actors in the economic marketplace. We will discuss an economic experiment to determine if such actors indeed form a moral floor.|
|Keywords||ethical behavior corporate social performance corporate financial performance|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Satava, Cam Caldwell & Linda Richards (2006). Ethics and the Auditing Culture: Rethinking the Foundation of Accounting and Auditing. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 64 (3):271 - 284.
William Kline (2006). Business Ethics From the Internal Point of View. Journal of Business Ethics 64 (1):57 - 67.
Robert Elliott Allinson (2004). Circles Within a Circle: The Condition for the Possibility of Ethical Business Institutions Within a Market System. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):17-28.
William P. Cordeiro (2003). Should Business Ethics Be Different in Transitional Economies? Journal of Business Ethics 47 (4):327 - 334.
Robert F. O'Neil & Darlene A. Pienta (1994). Economic Criteria Versus Ethical Criteria Toward Resolving a Basic Dilemma in Business. Journal of Business Ethics 13 (1):71 - 78.
Sigmund Wagner-Tsukamoto (2005). An Economic Approach to Business Ethics: Moral Agency of the Firm and the Enabling and Constraining Effects of Economic Institutions and Interactions in a Market Economy. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 60 (1):75 - 89.
Ronald Duska (2005). The Good Auditor – Skeptic or Wealth Accumulator? Ethical Lessons Learned From the Arthur Andersen Debacle. Journal of Business Ethics 57 (1):17 - 29.
Steven E. Kaplan, Pamela B. Roush & Linda Thorne (2007). Andersen and the Market for Lemons in Audit Reports. Journal of Business Ethics 70 (4):363 - 373.
N. Craig Smith & Michelle Quirk (2004). From Grace to Disgrace. Journal of Business Ethics Education 1 (1):91-130.
Mohammad J. Abdolmohammadi, William J. Read & D. Paul Scarbrough (2003). Does Selection-Socialization Help to Explain Accountants' Weak Ethical Reasoning? Journal of Business Ethics 42 (1):71 - 81.
Added to index2009-04-27
Total downloads30 ( #46,435 of 739,345 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,345 )
How can I increase my downloads?