Foundations of Science 16 (1):67-99 (2011)
|Abstract||Impressions, energy radiated by phenomena in the momentary environmental scene, enter sensory neurons, creating in afferent nerves a data stream. Following Kant, by our inner sense the mind perceives its own thoughts as it ties together sense data into an internalized scene. The mind, residing in the brain, logically a Language Machine, processes and stores items as coded grammatical entities. Kantian synthetic unity in the linguistic brain is able to deliver our experience of the scene as we appear to see it. Uniquely, the brain records its own history, synthesizing a Movie-in-the-Brain, called the Noumenal Cosmos. Attempting thereby to represent the actual Universe, this makes for a sovereign brain that governs itself. The brain is domicile of an Ego, with its selfhood at stake at all times. Yet, it can know itself only by its actions, in which it appears as an actor in its own movie. Phenomena enter garbled, as confused apparitions, and must be put in good form using top–down feedback control by Ego, so that each movie frame makes rational sense within the overall context of the Noumenal Cosmos. A stack of frames is processed typically in 40 Hz rhythm with 300 ms process time each, for about 12 in the stack at any time. Successive neural centers are processing the stack in the brain assembly line, based on data from increasingly global receptive fields. Ego stitches together the movie frames, but only the top frame is in consciousness for 25 ms. The top frame contains the whole scene where the Ego makes an appearance as the actor that imposes Kantian synthetic unity on the scene, merely an assembly of grammatical texts, in a system-internal coded process language, fitting the scene into the Noumenal Cosmos. But Ego observes Ego only to the extent permitted by the objectivity rule, only what it does and thinks, not its true face. From the Noumenal Cosmos, the Ego receives grammatical messages in the internal sense code. They are integrated into a whole in the reaction of the Ego to the momentary scene. The voluntary nature of Ego’s decisions is explained, based on its ability to code in advance its own actions sequentially in time, as it sees fit with a view to an orderly Noumenal Cosmos, records of code being arranged spatially in neural structures|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jie Shang (2007). Imagination of the Evil. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (3):412-422.
James R. Mensch (2009). The Phenomenological Status of the Ego. Idealistic Studies 39 (1/3):1-9.
Victor Molchanov (2009). The Ego: The Problem and the Term as Treated by Russian Philosophy. Studies in East European Thought 61 (2/3):181 - 188.
J. R. Smythies (1956). Analysis Of Perception. London,: Routledge &Amp; K Paul,.
Roland Breeur (2001). Bergson's and Sartre's Account of the Self in Relation to the Transcendental Ego. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (2):177 – 198.
Adrian Mirvish (2002). Sartre on the Ego, Friendship and Conflict. Continental Philosophy Review 35 (2):185-205.
Shizuo Takiura (1992). Self and Others in “Private Language”. Human Studies 15 (1):47 - 59.
David Pears (1994). Hintikka's Interpretation of Wittgenstein's Treatment of Sensation-Language. Grazer Philosophische Studien 49:1-18.
Jim Hanson (2005). Searching for the High-I. Asian Philosophy 15 (3):247 – 264.
Peter De Graef & Filip Germeys (2003). Reading the Scene: Application of E-Z Reader to Object and Scene Perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):479-480.
Lorraine Viscardi-Murray (1985). The Constitution of the Alter Ego in Husserl's Transcendental Phenomenology. Research in Phenomenology 15 (1):177-191.
John Hartmann, The Aporia of Affection in Husserl's Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis.
Added to index2010-11-21
Total downloads23 ( #53,879 of 549,128 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,128 )
How can I increase my downloads?