Verbal Sparring and Apologetic Points: Politeness in Gendered Argumentation Contexts

Informal Logic 30 (3):235-262 (2010)
Abstract
This essay argues that ideals of cooperation or adversariality in argumentation are not equally attainable for women. Women in argumentation contexts face oppressive limitations undermining argument success because their authority is undermined by gendered norms of politeness. Women endorsing or, alternatively, transgressing feminine norms of politeness typically defend their authority in argumentation contexts. And yet, defending authority renders it less legitimate. My argument focuses on women in philosophy but bears the implication that other masculine dis- course contexts present similar double binds that urge social and political change.
Keywords politeness  argumentation  adversality  authority  gendered discourse  adversariality  gender  language  oppression  feminist
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Sylvia Burrow, Verbal Sparring and Apologetic Points: Politeness in Gendered Argumentation Contexts
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-02

Total downloads

75 ( #18,285 of 1,101,623 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

26 ( #5,052 of 1,101,623 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.