Why America Still Needs the Jury Trial: A Friendly Response to Professor Dzur
Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):93-95 (2011)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAlbert W. Dzur (2011). “Why American Democracy Needs the Jury Trial”. Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):87-92.
Thom Brooks (2004). The Right to Trial by Jury. Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (2):197–212.
Thom Brooks (2004). A Defence of Jury Nullification. Res Publica 10 (4).
John F. Quinn (1993). The Right to Trial by Jury. Social Philosophy Today 8:91-101.
Peter Bachrach (1958). The Senate Debate on the Right to Jury Trial Versus the Right to Vote Controversy: A Case Study in Liberal Thought. Ethics 68 (3):210-216.
Jan-Willem Romeijn & David Atkinson (2011). Learning Juror Competence: A Generalized Condorcet Jury Theorem. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (3):237-262.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-09-13Total downloads5 ( #160,204 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
