Wilderness and the bantu mind
Environmental Ethics 16 (2):145-160 (1994)
| Abstract | In the West, it is widely believed that, since Africans lack an emotional experience with romanticism and transcendentalism, they do not possess the philosophical prerequisites necessary to protect wilderness. However, the West’s disdain for African systems of thought has precluded examination of customary African views of wilderness. Examination of ethnographic reports on Kenya’s Highland Bantu reveals a complex view of phenomena that the West generally associates with wilderness. For the Bantu, wilderness is an extension of human living space, and through concerted social action rather than individual initiative, it is, or at least can be, dominated by society. Wildlife is unnatural and alienated from human society, which is natural. Because wilderness is, consequently, understood to be fearsome and hostile, it is not a place that can provide inspiration or self-actualization. Almost all forests have a special spiritual relationship with humankind, and some trees have a special relationship with God. Althoughtraditional Bantu thought is contrary to a concept of wilderness as conserved, managed space filled with tourists and recreators, it does embrace a concept of wilderness as wildlands. The Bantu have gone to considerable length to develop an approach to wilderness that minimizes individual contact while requiring association with wilderness as a social activity. Population growth and want of vocational opportunities continue to thrust Highland Bantu into wilderness as a fundamental and traditional survival technique | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJ. Baird Callicott (2008). What “Wilderness” in Frontier Ecosystems? Environmental Ethics 30 (3):235-249.
Greta Gaard (1997). Ecofeminism and Wilderness. Environmental Ethics 19 (1):5-24.
Greta Gaard (1997). Ecofeminism and Wilderness. Environmental Ethics 19 (1):5-24.
Karen Syse (2001). Ethics in the Woods. Ethics, Place and Environment 4 (3):226 – 234.
Wayne Ouderkirk (2003). On Wilderness and People: A View From Mount Marcy. Philosophy and Geography 6 (1):15 – 32.
David Havlick (2006). Reconsidering Wilderness: Prospective Ethics for Nature, Technology, and Society. Ethics, Place and Environment 9 (1):47 – 62.
Scott Friskics (2008). The Twofold Myth of Pristine Wilderness. Environmental Ethics 30 (4):381-399.
Kimberly K. Smith (2005). What is Africa to Me?: Wilderness in Black Thought From 1860 to 1930. Environmental Ethics 27 (3):279-297.
David Graham Henderson (2009). The Possibility of Managing for Wilderness. Environmental Ethics 31 (4):413-429.
David Graham Henderson (2009). The Possibility of Managing for Wilderness. Environmental Ethics 31 (4):413-429.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
