David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Psychology 4 (3):325-342 (1991)
Abstract This paper presents an evaluation of the role and function of discourse analysis in relation to claims that it promotes critical interventions within psychology. Discourse analysis challenges the function, truth claims and methodological adequacy of psychological practices, through attending to difference, resistance, relativism and reflexivity. However, these features pose theoretical and conceptual difficulties, particularly if a theoretically motivated position is attributed to the framework itself, rather than the ways it has been taken up and used. I explore how these issues are played out in the arenas of (a) research practice, (b) teaching discourse analysis, and (c) everyday discursive clashes. As with other approaches that have generated methodological innovations, discourse analysis can work to support, rather than challenge, mainstream psychological practices. In order to maintain the fruitful dynamic of discourse analysis, therefore, we should acknowledge the political concerns that motivate our analysis, rather than regard them as a property of the approach itself
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Michael Billig (ed.) (1988). Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking. Sage Publications.
Michel Foucault (1977). Discipline and Punish. Vintage Books.
Citations of this work BETA
Rusla Anne Springer (2011). Pharmaceutical Industry Discursives and the Marketization of Nursing Work: A Case Example. Nursing Philosophy 12 (3):214-228.
Similar books and articles
Reiner Keller (2011). The Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse (SKAD). Human Studies 34 (1):43-65.
Ian Parker (1990). Discourse: Definitions and Contradictions. Philosophical Psychology 3 (2 & 3):187 – 204.
Myriam Bras & Laure Vieu (eds.) (2001). Semantic and Pragmatic Issues in Discourse and Dialogue: Experimenting with Current Dynamic Theories. Elsevier.
Michelle M. Lazar (ed.) (2005). Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Gender, Power, and Ideology in Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sally Jackson (1998). Disputation by Design. Argumentation 12 (2):183-198.
Diane Rodgers (2012). Busy as a Bee or Unemployed?: Shifting Scientific Discourse on Work. Minerva 50 (1):45-64.
Margareth Sandvik (1997). Reconstructing Interactive Argumentative Discourse. Argumentation 11 (4):419-434.
Stuart Toddington (2006). The Moral Truth About Discourse Theory. Ratio Juris 19 (2):217-229.
Luca Magni (2011). Research Proposal for the Application of Critical Discourse Analysis to the Study of Learning Cultures. Journal of Critical Realism 10 (4):527-542.
Hans Sluga (1985). Foucault, the Author, and the Discourse. Inquiry 28 (1-4):403 – 415.
Jon Torgerson (1988). Reichenbach and Smart on Temporal Discourse. Philosophy Research Archives 14:381-394.
Dominic Abrams & Michael A. Hogg (1990). The Context of Discourse: Let's Not Throw Out the Baby with the Bathwater. Philosophical Psychology 3 (2 & 3):219 – 225.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads9 ( #147,455 of 1,096,392 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #84,309 of 1,096,392 )
How can I increase my downloads?