Capabilities in, capabilities out: overcoming digital divides by promoting corporate citizenship and fair ICT [Book Review]
Ethics and Information Technology 13 (4):339-353 (2011)
|Abstract||This conceptual article discusses strategies of corporations in the information and communication technologies (ICT) sector and their role in the conflict over access to knowledge in the digital environment. Its main hypothesis is that ICT corporations are very capable actors when it comes to bridging digital divides in both developed and developing countries—maybe even the most capable actors. Therefore, it is argued that ICT corporations could use their capabilities to help citizens gain sustainable access to knowledge in order to enable them to lead self-sufficient lives. In a nutshell, capabilities are presented as both the input (capabilities of ICT corporations) as well as the output (capability building for empowering citizens) of corporate strategy-making focusing on fair ICT. Corporate citizenship is put forth as the theoretical concept bridging corporate strategies and access to knowledge: If ICT corporations act in accordance with their self-understanding of being ‘good corporate citizens’, they could be crucial partners in lessening digital divides and helping citizens gain access to knowledge. From the perspective of ‘integrative economic ethics’ (Ulrich 2008), it is argued that ICT corporations have good reason to actively empower citizens in both developed and developing countries by pursuing ‘inclusive’ strategies in many fields, such as open-source software development. That way, ICT corporations could enable, support and provide citizens with capabilities enabling them to help themselves. In order to make inclusive business models work, the rules and regulations companies find themselves in today must enable them to act responsibly without getting penalized by more ruthless competitors. This article explores several cases from the ICT field to illustrate the interplay between a responsible business model and the rules and regulations of the industry. From a capabilities perspective, the most desirable mix of corporate strategies and industry regulation is one that results in the highest level of generativity (Zittrain 2008). Thus, ICT should not be closed systems only driven by the company behind them. Instead, they need to be open for the highest possible level of third-party innovation.|
|Keywords||Business ethics Corporate citizenship Corporate social responsibility Digital divides Digital sustainability ICT Intellectual property Strategic management|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Antonino Vaccaro & Peter Madsen (2009). Corporate Dynamic Transparency: The New Ict-Driven Ethics? [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 11 (2):113-122.
Jeremy Moon, Andrew Crane & Dirk Matten (2005). Can Corporations Be Citizens? Corporate Citizenship as a Metaphor for Business Participation in Society. Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (3):429-453.
Angela M. Crack (2008). Global Communication and Transnational Public Spheres. Palgrave Macmillan.
Luciano Floridi (2006). Information Technologies and the Tragedy of the Good Will. Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):253-262.
Dirk Matten, Andrew Crane & Wendy Chapple (2003). Behind the Mask: Revealing the True Face of Corporate Citizenship. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 45 (1-2):109 - 120.
Andrea Iacovella (2009). Part I. Can Ict Tell History?: 1. Elements for a Digital Historiography. In Bernard Reber & Claire Brossaud (eds.), Digital Cognitive Technologies: Epistemology and Knowledge Society. Iste Ltd.
Maria Lai-Ling Lam (2009). Beyond Credibility of Doing Business in China: Strategies for Improving Corporate Citizenship of Foreign Multinational Enterprises in China. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 87 (1):137 - 146.
Sandra Waddock (2005). Corporate Citizenship. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:184-189.
Dirk van Rooy & Jacques Bus (2010). Trust and Privacy in the Future Internet—a Research Perspective. Identity in the Information Society 3 (2):397-404.
Leeora D. Black & Lori Cordingley (2007). Can Social Responsiveness Capabilities Deliver Competitive Advantage in Industry Settings? An Empirical Study of the Electricity Generation Industry in Victoria, Australia. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:113-117.
Matthew P. Butcher (2009). At the Foundations of Information Justice. Ethics and Information Technology 11 (1):57-69.
Christopher P. Vogt (2005). Maximizing Human Potential: Capabilities Theory and the Professional Work Environment. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 58 (1-3):111 - 123.
Eamon Daly (2010). Personal Autonomy in the Travel Panopticon. Ethics and Information Technology 12 (2):97-108.
Jae Hwan Lee & Ronald K. Mitchell (2011). Towards Refining the Concept of Corporate Citizenship. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:265-273.
Added to index2011-11-05
Total downloads4 ( #188,662 of 722,698 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,698 )
How can I increase my downloads?