Ecology-driven real options: An investment framework for incorporating uncertainties in the context of the natural environment [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 90 (2):295 - 310 (2009)
The role of uncertainty within an organization’s environment features prominently in the business ethics and management literature, but how corporate investment decisions should proceed in the face of uncertainties relating to the natural environment is less discussed. From the perspective of ecological economics, the salience of ecology-induced issues challenges management to address new types of uncertainties. These pertain to constraints within the natural environment as well as to institutional action aimed at conserving the natural environment. We derive six areas of ecology-induced uncertainties and propose ecology-driven real options as a conceptual approach for systematically incorporating these uncertainties into strategic management. We combine our results in an integrative investment framework and illustrate its application with the case of carbon constraints.
|Keywords||ecological economics uncertainty natural environment real options investment planning|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert Costanza (ed.) (1991). Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability. Columbia University Press.
Andrew Crane (2007). Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford University Press.
Jenny Dawkins & Stewart Lewis (2003). CSR in Stakeholder Expectations: And Their Implication for Company Strategy. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2-3):185 - 193.
Kristen Bell DeTienne & Lee W. Lewis (2005). The Pragmatic and Ethical Barriers to Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: The Nike Case. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 60 (4):359 - 376.
O. C. Ferrell (2013). Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making and Cases. Houghton Mifflin Co.
Citations of this work BETA
Subrata Chakrabarty & Liang Wang (2012). The Long-Term Sustenance of Sustainability Practices in MNCs: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective of the Role of R&D and Internationalization. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 110 (2):205-217.
Richard Peters, Ethan Waples & Peggy Golden (2014). A Real Options Reasoning Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Integrating Real Option Sensemaking and CSR Orientation. Business and Society Review 119 (1):61-93.
Similar books and articles
Stephania Bonilla & Rosa Castro, A Law-and-Economics Analysis of International Investment Treaties: Latin America.
Mark Starik (1995). Should Trees Have Managerial Standing? Toward Stakeholder Status for Non-Human Nature. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (3):207 - 217.
Réal Labelle, Rim Makni Gargouri & Claude Francoeur (2010). Ethics, Diversity Management, and Financial Reporting Quality. Journal of Business Ethics 93 (2):335 - 355.
B. S. Niven (1982). Formalization of the Basic Concepts of Animal Ecology. Erkenntnis 17 (3):307 - 320.
Bryan W. Husted (2005). Risk Management, Real Options, Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 60 (2):175 - 183.
E. Marchant Gary, J. Sylvester Douglas & W. Abbott Kenneth (2008). Risk Management Principles for Nanotechnology. NanoEthics 2 (1).
Gary E. Marchant, Douglas J. Sylvester & Kenneth W. Abbott (2008). Risk Management Principles for Nanotechnology. NanoEthics 2 (1):43-60.
Added to index2009-03-21
Total downloads19 ( #102,742 of 1,679,368 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #78,917 of 1,679,368 )
How can I increase my downloads?