From belief to unbelief and back to belief: A response to Michael Ruse

Zygon 29 (1):55-65 (1994)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 14,265
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Michael Ruse (1980). Is Science Sexist? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (2):197.
Michael Ruse (1981). Is Science Sexist? And Other Problems in the Biomedical Sciences. D. Reidel Distributed in the U.S.A. And Canada by Kluwer Boston.

View all 8 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Michael Bergmann (2006). Epistemic Circularity and Common Sense: A Reply to Reed. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):198-207.
A. D. H. (1976). Between Belief and Unbelief. Review of Metaphysics 29 (3):557-558.
J. F. O'Malley (1956). Belief and Unbelief Since 1850. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 31 (1):144-144.
David Hunter (2011). Alienated Belief. Dialectica 65 (2):221-240.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

6 ( #302,951 of 1,700,337 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #362,609 of 1,700,337 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.