Philosophy and Technology 25 (2):243-248 (2012)
|Abstract||Abstract As Paul B. Thompson suggests in his recent seminal paper, “‘There’s an App for That’: Technical Standards and Commodification by Technological Means,” technical standards restructure property (and other social) relations. He concludes with the claim that the development of technical standards of commodification can serve purposes with bad effects such as “the rise of the factory system and the deskilling of work” or progressive effects such as how “technical standards for animal welfare… discipline the unwanted consequences of market forces.” In this reply, we want to append several points to his argument and suggest that he rightly points out that standards can promote various goods; however, there are peculiar powers wielded by standardization processes that might profitably be unpacked more systematically than Thompson's article seems to suggest. First, the concealment of the technopolitics around standards is largely due to their peculiar ontological status as recipes for reality. Second, technical standards can and do commit violence against persons, but such violence is often suffered not in the formation of class consciousness, as Marx might have put it, but as a failure to conform to the laws of nature . Content Type Journal Article Category Commentary Pages 1-6 DOI 10.1007/s13347-011-0048-1 Authors Lawrence Busch, Department of Sociology, Michigan State University, 429A Berkey Hall, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA Kyle Powys Whyte, Department of Philosophy, Michigan State University, 503 S. Kedzie Hall, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA Journal Philosophy & Technology Online ISSN 2210-5441 Print ISSN 2210-5433.|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kyle Powys Whyte & Paul B. Thompson (2012). Ideas for How to Take Wicked Problems Seriously. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (4):441-445.
Paul Thompson (2012). “There's an App for That”: Technical Standards and Commodification by Technological Means. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Technology 25 (1):87-103.
Paul Thompson & Kyle Whyte (2012). What Happens to Environmental Philosophy in a Wicked World? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (4):485-498.
Evan Selinger, Jesús Aguilar & Kyle Powys Whyte (2011). Action Schemes: Questions and Suggestions. Philosophy and Technology 24 (1):83-88.
Paul B. Thompson (2013). F. Bailey Norwood and Jayson L. Lusk: Compassion by the Pound: The Economics of Farm Animal Welfare. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (2):517-521.
Stewart Cohen (1987). Knowledge, Context, and Social Standards. Synthese 73 (1):3 - 26.
Dayna Simpson, Damien Power & Robert Klassen (2012). When One Size Does Not Fit All: A Problem of Fit Rather Than Failure for Voluntary Management Standards. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 110 (1):85-95.
Herb Strentz (2002). Universal Ethical Standards? Journal of Mass Media Ethics 17 (4):263 – 276.
Paul Thompson (2012). Re-Envisioning the Agrarian Ideal. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (4):553-562.
Chrisoula Andreou (2006). Standards, Advice, and Practical Reason. Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (1):57-67.
Gerald Doppelt (1980). Ii. A Reply to Siegel on Kuhnian Relativism. Inquiry 23 (1):117 – 123.
Dianne Mulcahy (2011). Assembling the 'Accomplished' Teacher: The Performativity and Politics of Professional Teaching Standards. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (5-6):94-113.
Charles J. Woelfel (1986). Standards of Ethical Conduct for Management Accountants. Journal of Business Ethics 5 (5):365 - 371.
Kevin D. Hall (2004). Student Development and Ownership of Ethical and Professional Standards. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):383-387.
Added to index2011-10-04
Total downloads5 ( #169,941 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?