Some Remarks on Mr. Russell's Article, “A Modern Zeno”
The Monist 19 (3):407-409 (1909)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFrancis C. Russell (1909). A Modern Zeno. The Monist 19 (2):289-308.
David M. Sherry (1988). Zeno's Metrical Paradox Revisited. Philosophy of Science 55 (1):58-73.
Adolf Grünbaum (1955). Modern Science and the Refutation of the Paradoxes of Zeno. In Wesley C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno’s Paradoxes. Bobbs-Merrill.
Adolf Grünbaum (1970). Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes of Motion. In Wesley C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno’s Paradoxes. Bobbs-Merrill.
Wesley C. Salmon (ed.) (1970). Zeno's Paradoxes. Bobbs-Merrill.
Nicholas Griffin (ed.) (2003). The Cambridge Companion to Bertrand Russell. Cambridge University Press.
K. G. Binmore & Alex Voorhoeve (2003). Defending Transitivity Against Zeno’s Paradox. Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (3):272–279.
Phil Hopkins (2006). Zeno's Boêtheia Tôi Logôi. Epoché 11 (1):1-25.
Bertrand Russell (ed.) (1973). Bertrand Russell, the Social Scientist. Bertrand Russell Supranational Society.
Chris Pincock (2008). Russell's Last (And Best) Multiple-Relation Theory of Judgement. Mind 117 (465):107 - 139.
Ofra Magidor (2008). Another Note on Zeno's Arrow. Phronesis 53 (s 4-5):359-372.
Bertrand Russell (1929). The Problem of the Infinite, Considered Historically. In Wesley C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno’s Paradoxes. Bobbs-Merrill.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-01-09Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
