David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Consciousness Studies 5 (2):132-140 (1998)
Galen Strawson considers the self to be best described as a cognitive, `distinctively mental' phenomenon. He asserts that the mental sense of self comes to every normal human being in childhood and comprises the sense of being a mental presence, of being alone in one's head, with the body `just a vehicle or vessel for the mental thing that is what one really or most essentially is' . His thesis is determinedly cognitivist and it is with this that I take issue. As Reed puts the problem, `cognitivism, with its allegiance to the representational theory of mind and its focus on mental states as internal to the mind, is particularly susceptible to the dualistic separation of self from the environment' . One may add that cognitivism is also susceptible to separating the self from the body. Reed suggests that perception not only provides information for the distinction between self and environment from the outset, but also it provides a means of keeping in contact with the world. Memory provides a means of bridging earlier and later aspects of self and integrating diverse elements of experience. Both perceiving and remembering entail aspects of self but in rather different ways. Perceiving is a spatio-temporal process which provides a continuous flow of information about the embodied self in its encounters with the physical and social world. Autobiographical memory requires a duplication of the self so that `me-experiencing-now' can be related with `a prior me-experiencing-a-prior-environment'. The question of interest is how a perceived self may, through development, give rise to a remembered self
|Keywords||Cognition Ecology Knowledge Metaphysics Self Strawson, G|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Richard Rorty (1970). Strawson's Objectivity Argument. Review of Metaphysics 24 (December):207-244.
David Bloor (1970). Explanation and Analysis in Strawson's Persons. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 48 (May):2-9.
Mark Sacks (2005). Sartre, Strawson and Others. Inquiry 48 (3):275-299.
Michael A. Smith (1998). Galen Strawson and the Weather Watchers. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (2):449-454.
H. P. Stapp (2006). Commentary on Strawson's Target Article. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (s 10-11):163-169.
Fiona Macpherson (2006). Property Dualism and the Merits of Solutions to the Mind-Body Problem: A Reply to Strawson. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (s 10-11):72-89.
Kenneth W. Rankin (1976). The Trinitarian Vision of P.F. Strawson. Philosophy Research Archives 1164.
Paul F. Snowdon (1998). Strawson's Agnostic Materialism. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (2):455-460.
Shaun Gallagher (ed.) (2002). Models of the Self. Thorverton UK: Imprint Academic.
Don Locke (1961). Strawson's Auditory Universe. Philosophical Review 70 (October):518-532.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #334,532 of 1,410,532 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #76,382 of 1,410,532 )
How can I increase my downloads?