Graduate studies at Western
Radical Philosophy Review 4 (1/2):95-101 (2001)
|Abstract||Popular images of rights almost always emphasize their protective qualities. But who is really protected? In this paper it is argued that contemporary rights talk, because of faulty underlying assumptions, systematically favors prejudice and big property interests. Further, once the mistaken assumptions are surrendered, and it is realized that all rights are affirmative, a less systematically misleading debate can be created within the realm of rights discourse|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Edwards (2006). Rights: Foundations, Contents, Hierarchy. Res Publica 12 (3):277-293.
Louis Pojman (1991). A Critique of Contemporary Egalitarianism. Faith and Philosophy 8 (4):481-504.
Michael Baur (2010). The Language of Rights. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:89-98.
Jeremy Waldron (2000). The Role of Rights in Practical Reasoning: ``Rights'' Versus ``Needs''. [REVIEW] Journal of Ethics 4 (1-2):115-135.
Seumas Miller (2000). Collective Rights and Minority Rights. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):241-257.
Erol Kuyurtar (2007). Are Cultural Group Rights Against Individual Rights? The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:51-59.
W. J. Talbott (2010). Human Rights and Human Well-Being. Oxford University Press.
Kwame Anthony Appiah (2011). “Group Rights” and Racial Affirmative Action. Journal of Ethics 15 (3):265-280.
Brian E. Butler (2001). All Rights Are Affirmative. Radical Philosophy Review 4 (1):95-101.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?