David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (2):215-231 (2005)
Taking as a guiding theme his claim that “there are effluvia from all things that have come to be,” (DK B89), the author presents a reading of Empedocles that stresses the central role of effluvia in his natural philosophy. In presentations of Empedocles, the tradition has usually emphasized the importance of the elements—earth, air, water, fire, Love, and Strife. But as an alternative to that tradition, the author here argues that one must bring to the forefront the role of the effluvia, which give to Empedocles’ cosmology a fluid, viscous character. The history of western natural science has been dominated by a mechanics of solid bodies following, however indirectly, in the tradition of the atoms and void of early Greek atomism. Empedocles represents a forgotten exception to that history, and the present paper attempts to return to his philosophy, unearth its fluid mechanical foundations, and present a challenging alternative to the dominant physical paradigm
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rachana Kamtekar (2009). Knowing by Likeness in Empedocles. Phronesis 54 (3):215-238.
David Farrell Krell (2007). “A Double Tale I Shall Tell . . . ”: Empedocles and Hölderlin on Tragic Nature and Tragic Purification. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2):287-304.
Catherine Osborne (1987). Rethinking Early Greek Philosophy: Hippolytus of Rome and the Presocratics. Cornell University Press.
David Farrell Krell (2007). “A Double Tale I Shall Tell . . . ”. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2):287-304.
Catherine Osborne (1987). Empedocles Recycled. Classical Quarterly 37 (01):24-.
Leon Trotsky, John Dewey & George Edward Novack (eds.) (1973). Their Morals and Ours. New York,Pathfinder Press.
M. R. Wright (1981). Empedocles: The Extant Fragments. Yale University Press.
Bruce V. Foltz (1984). On Heidegger and the Interpretation of Environmental Crisis. Environmental Ethics 6 (4):323-338.
Gordon Campbell, Empedocles. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Marwan Rashed (2011). La zoogonie de la Haine selon Empedocle: retour sur lensemble d du papyrus dAkhmim. Phronesis 56 (1):33-57.
Denis O'Brien (2000). Hermann Diels on the Presocratics: Empedocles' Double Destruction of the Cosmos ("Aetius" II 4.8). Phronesis 45 (1):1 - 18.
Denis O'Brien (2000). Hermann Diels on the Presocratics: Empedocles' Double Destruction of the Cosmos (Aetius Ii 4.8). Phronesis 45 (1):1-18.
Robert Nola (1980). Fixing the Reference of Theoretical Terms. Philosophy of Science 47 (4):505-531.
O. D. (1978). Empedocles with a Prefatory Essay 'Empedocles and T. S. Eliot' by Marshall Mcluhan. Review of Metaphysics 31 (3):488-489.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads1 ( #468,102 of 1,168,025 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #140,420 of 1,168,025 )
How can I increase my downloads?