Infants' representations of causation

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):126-127 (2011)
Abstract
It is consistent with the evidence in The Origin of Concepts to conjecture that infants' causal representations, like their numerical representations, are not continuous with adults', so that bootstrapping is needed in both cases
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X10002426
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 17,859
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
A. Michotte, T. R. Miles & Elaine Miles (1964). The Perception of Causality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15 (59):254-259.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Rick Grush (1997). The Architecture of Representation. Philosophical Psychology 10 (1):5-23.
Shaun Gallagher (2008). Are Minimal Representations Still Representations? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (3):351 – 369.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-10-18

Total downloads

20 ( #160,410 of 1,781,364 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #123,404 of 1,781,364 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.